Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Korean Journal of Radiology ; : 792-800, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-894770

ABSTRACT

Bone age assessments are a complicated and lengthy process, which are prone to inter- and intra-observer variabilities. Despite the great demand for fully automated systems, developing an accurate and robust bone age assessment solution has remained challenging. The rapidly evolving deep learning technology has shown promising results in automated bone age assessment. In this review article, we will provide information regarding the history of automated bone age assessments, discuss the current status, and present a literature review, as well as the future directions of artificial intelligence-based bone age assessments.

2.
Korean Journal of Radiology ; : 792-800, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-902474

ABSTRACT

Bone age assessments are a complicated and lengthy process, which are prone to inter- and intra-observer variabilities. Despite the great demand for fully automated systems, developing an accurate and robust bone age assessment solution has remained challenging. The rapidly evolving deep learning technology has shown promising results in automated bone age assessment. In this review article, we will provide information regarding the history of automated bone age assessments, discuss the current status, and present a literature review, as well as the future directions of artificial intelligence-based bone age assessments.

3.
Imaging Science in Dentistry ; : 237-243, 2020.
Article | WPRIM | ID: wpr-835434

ABSTRACT

Purpose@#The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3)-based fully automated bone age assessment system on hand-wrist radiographs of Korean children and adolescents. @*Materials and Methods@#Hand-wrist radiographs of 80 subjects (40 boys and 40 girls, 7-15 years of age) were collected. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by comparing the bone ages that were determined using the system with those from the reference standard produced by 2 oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Comparisons were conducted using the paired t-test and simple regression analysis. @*Results@#The bone ages estimated with this bone age assessment system were not significantly different from those obtained with the reference standard (p>0.05) and satisfied the equivalence criterion of 0.6 years within the 95% confidence interval ( - 0.07 to 0.22), demonstrating excellent performance of the system. Similarly, in the comparisons of gender subgroups, no significant difference in bone age between the values produced by the system and the reference standard was observed (p>0.05 for both boys and girls). The determination coefficients obtained via regression analysis were 0.962, 0.945, and 0.952 for boys, girls, and overall, respectively (p=0.000); hence, the radiologist-determined bone ages and the system-determined bone ages were strongly correlated. @*Conclusion@#This TW3-based system can be effectively used for bone age assessment based on hand-wrist radiographs of Korean children and adolescents.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL